tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6149439544837612040.post2225355696683023754..comments2009-02-02T06:16:51.175-08:00kruschhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08705380350689597775klausrusch@atmedia.netBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6149439544837612040.post-86778306280017144642009-02-02T05:41:00.000-08:002009-02-02T05:41:00.000-08:00What happened <A HREF="http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1204.html" REL="nofollow">inside Google?</A><BR/><BR/>:)Michael Baierlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07690184163589461728klausrusch@atmedia.nettag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6149439544837612040.post-59780506575616491492009-02-01T02:07:00.000-08:002009-02-01T02:07:00.000-08:00From a security perspective, flagging all sites as suspicious when the malware status is unavailable for some reason would actually not be a bad strategy.<BR/><BR/>The incorrect flagging was not caused by a fail-safe strategy, but was the <A HREF="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/this-site-may-harm-your-computer-on.html" REL="nofollow">result of a human error, according to Google's Marissa Mayer</A>.kruschhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08705380350689597775klausrusch@atmedia.net